2021-10-07, 07:25 AM
I managed to record the trail of Nereid, one of the fainter satellites of Neptune at mag. 18.69, according to SkyTools 4 Imaging.
Nereid is the third largest of Neptune’s moons, and the second to have been discovered. It was discovered on 1st May, 1949 by the Dutch American astronomer Gerard P. Kuiper (for whom the Kuiper Belt is named) using photographic plates from the McDonald Observatory in Fort Davis, Texas. It is named after the numerous daughters, called Nereids, of the sea god Nereus in Greek mythology.
Nereid has a diameter of about 340 km (210 miles). It revolves around Neptune with a period of just over 360 days in a highly elliptical orbit—the most eccentric of any known moon—that is inclined by more than 7° to the planet’s equator. Its mean distance from Neptune is 5,513,400 km (3,425,900 miles), which is about 15 times farther from Neptune than Triton. Nereid is exceedingly faint, making observations with even the largest Earth-based telescopes very difficult.
I took 60x30 sec frames then after a Meridian flip, another 50x60 sec frames. I threw these into PixInsight which handled the Meridian Flip and differing exposure times without breaking a sweat.
Images taken with a Tak Mewlon 210 F11.5, Tak Reducer/Flattener x0.8 and ZWO ASI 294 MM Pro camera from our back garden in suburban Brisbane, under Bortle class 6 skies on 5th Oct 2021.
I have overlaid Screen Captures from SkyTools 4 Imaging to show some of the field stars as well as the lucky catch of the Minor Planet (1698) Christophe at mag. 16.63 (Diameter: 10 - 31 km). Perihelion Distance is 2.8 AU, Aphelion Distance is 3.5 AU. I haven't updated the Minor Planet database for a few months and wonder if this has led to the slight discrepancy?
When I set the capture time in ST4, the plotted position of Christophe did not match the actual trail in my series of images. In ST4 it seems that Christophe was “behind” the recorded position by 2 or 3 hours? ST4 is set for my back garden location in Brisbane and the Win 10 PC clock was synchronised with the Time Server.
Cheers
Dennis
Nereid is the third largest of Neptune’s moons, and the second to have been discovered. It was discovered on 1st May, 1949 by the Dutch American astronomer Gerard P. Kuiper (for whom the Kuiper Belt is named) using photographic plates from the McDonald Observatory in Fort Davis, Texas. It is named after the numerous daughters, called Nereids, of the sea god Nereus in Greek mythology.
Nereid has a diameter of about 340 km (210 miles). It revolves around Neptune with a period of just over 360 days in a highly elliptical orbit—the most eccentric of any known moon—that is inclined by more than 7° to the planet’s equator. Its mean distance from Neptune is 5,513,400 km (3,425,900 miles), which is about 15 times farther from Neptune than Triton. Nereid is exceedingly faint, making observations with even the largest Earth-based telescopes very difficult.
I took 60x30 sec frames then after a Meridian flip, another 50x60 sec frames. I threw these into PixInsight which handled the Meridian Flip and differing exposure times without breaking a sweat.
Images taken with a Tak Mewlon 210 F11.5, Tak Reducer/Flattener x0.8 and ZWO ASI 294 MM Pro camera from our back garden in suburban Brisbane, under Bortle class 6 skies on 5th Oct 2021.
I have overlaid Screen Captures from SkyTools 4 Imaging to show some of the field stars as well as the lucky catch of the Minor Planet (1698) Christophe at mag. 16.63 (Diameter: 10 - 31 km). Perihelion Distance is 2.8 AU, Aphelion Distance is 3.5 AU. I haven't updated the Minor Planet database for a few months and wonder if this has led to the slight discrepancy?
When I set the capture time in ST4, the plotted position of Christophe did not match the actual trail in my series of images. In ST4 it seems that Christophe was “behind” the recorded position by 2 or 3 hours? ST4 is set for my back garden location in Brisbane and the Win 10 PC clock was synchronised with the Time Server.
Cheers
Dennis