Posts: 5,118
Threads: 279
Thanks Received:
235 in 210 posts
Thanks Given: 101
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi,
The green/red is the indicator that one of your subscriptions has been undated. Click on it to see which one. I update the novae/supernovae regularly.
Regarding the asteroids, I am sorry, but don't have your answers. I am confident that SkyTools is plotting orbits accurately, given an accurate orbit. Under normal circumstances, the NEA Today orbital elements reflect the most recent observations, and are also calculated for an epoch at the current date. But the MPC is having trouble right now because of the pandemic. The telescopes on Mount Lemon have been evacuated because of a wild fire. It is important to understand that most close approaching asteroids need constant monitoring in order to continuously refine the orbit.
I see no reason to assume that HORIZONS is more accurate. The normal advantage of HORIZONS is that it does the orbital calculations necessary to produce a position independent from the limitations of osculating orbital elements, which lose accuracy over time. But keep in mind that the special NEA Today elements are supposed to accomplish the exact same thing. The discrepancy means that either the data from the MPC or JPL has not been updated to reflect the latest observations. For all we know, neither of them have been. Consider that the MPC is where everyone sends their observations for analysis and the MPC is specifically tasked with tracking near earth asteroids. So as far as I know, HORIZONS is actually dependent on the MPC for updated data. It is possible that they have direct data pipelines from some of the big surveys, but I doubt it.
Previous experience does not seem to apply in the current situation. If you really want to know which one is generating the correct positions, your best bet is to compare to actual observations, or to ask the MPC or JPL. Another possibility is to get on the MMPL listserv and ask the knowledgeable people there, many of whom are part of the professional asteroid community.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 741
Threads: 136
Thanks Received:
18 in 17 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation:
2
Thanks for the reply. I was hoping to make a verification observation tonight but weather will stall that attempt. It was going to be really dubious due to altitude and being near my limiting magnitude reach. I'm friends with one of the astronomers at Lowell so I might contact him.
Posts: 2,396
Threads: 410
Thanks Received:
82 in 79 posts
Thanks Given: 86
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
29
The MPC used to post the observed positions for comets. Do they do that for the MPs as well. You could try to compare the observed positions from MPC Circulars with the calculated positions from ST4v & HORIZONS to see how they compare.
Just a thought,
Phil S.
Posts: 741
Threads: 136
Thanks Received:
18 in 17 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation:
2
2020-06-25, 01:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 2020-06-25, 01:55 AM by bigmasterdrago.)
Sounds like a good idea. I might need to know where the rock is observed from. I think I ran across an observatory code list somewhere that has that info.
One thing that I did try was to edit the elements of 2020 MP1 to precisely match those being used by Horizons. They were only slightly off to begin with. This put the ST position about 1.3' farther away from the Horizons position.
Best I can tell from a little digging 2020 MP1 was detected by NASA’s automated asteroid tracking system, Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS).
Posts: 2,396
Threads: 410
Thanks Received:
82 in 79 posts
Thanks Given: 86
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
29
Yes, you are correct. You will need to calculate the ephemeris for the location of the observatory that provided the position observations. The parallax on an asteroid at close approach would be significant otherwise.
Phil S.
Posts: 5,118
Threads: 279
Thanks Received:
235 in 210 posts
Thanks Given: 101
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi,
Yes, there is a known bug in the pasting of JPL elements. I am sorry that the update isn't ready yet that will fix it. The deeper I dug into the Scheduler, the more there was to fix. Until today, meridian flips were completely broken, so there was no way to release the update with the other fixes. Thankfully, my deep dive into that abyss seems to be about over. Fingers crossed.
In the meantime, if you tell what date/time you want a HORIZONS orbit for, I can copy/paste it and then post it here as a single-object observing list. All you have to do is read it into ST4 and you will have the orbit in your database.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound