Posts: 5,180
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
247 in 220 posts
Thanks Given: 111
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
2021-08-29, 12:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 2021-08-29, 12:57 AM by theskyhound.)
I got a little carried away in testing the new iTelescope, T69, at Siding Spring. It's a simple color system, and I almost have it dialed in for SkyTools.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 2,440
Threads: 426
Thanks Received:
89 in 86 posts
Thanks Given: 93
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
30
Both T69 and T68 in New Mexico look like great scopes. Both are Celestron RASA 11" OTAs.
Looking forward to having T69, T70 & T19 added to the list. I see there's also a T71 being installed in Chile.
Phil S.
Posts: 5,180
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
247 in 220 posts
Thanks Given: 111
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
T70 just keeps failing, so I wouldn't get your hopes up for Chile anytime soon. Its been failing with some sort of configuration error for days now. I don't know why they don't just take it offline.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 2,440
Threads: 426
Thanks Received:
89 in 86 posts
Thanks Given: 93
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
30
Hi Greg,
At least I managed to log onto T70 recently. It uses a 135 mm Samyang camera lens as the OTA. 68 mm objective diameter. I don't know what they've planned for T71.
Your image of the Cat's Paw is very impressive. What was the exposure time? T69 is f/2.2 just like T68. Photographically fast.
Phil S.
Posts: 5,180
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
247 in 220 posts
Thanks Given: 111
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
2021-08-30, 03:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 2021-08-30, 03:15 AM by theskyhound.)
(2021-08-29, 08:37 PM)PMSchu Wrote: Hi Greg,
At least I managed to log onto T70 recently. It uses a 135 mm Samyang camera lens as the OTA. 68 mm objective diameter. I don't know what they've planned for T71.
Your image of the Cat's Paw is very impressive. What was the exposure time? T69 is f/2.2 just like T68. Photographically fast.
Phil S.
It was 10 x 240s exposures, stacked in Pixinsight, and processed in Lightroom. I asked them why the maximum exposure is 240 seconds and they said that was what they expected the maximum useful exposure to be. Right now, I'm having some trouble getting the model to accurately predict T68, but once I do I can investigate longer exposure times to ensure they are correct (that 240s is the maximum useful exposure). I'm a big fan of long exposures at dark sky sites. I see people stacking large numbers of 60 second exposures and it drives me nuts.
Its basically a function of how deep you want to go, but I always seem to want to go as far as the system will allow.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 2,440
Threads: 426
Thanks Received:
89 in 86 posts
Thanks Given: 93
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
30
The long exposures are best if the sky fog is low. With all the Starlink satellites, though, there's a higher chance one will appear in the longer exposures & cost the whole shot. Can't win.
Phil S.
Posts: 5,180
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
247 in 220 posts
Thanks Given: 111
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi Phil,
True, and there are other cosmetic things that can happen when you use long exposures. Of course, satellites in low earth orbit can be avoided by not exposing near twilight. If the satellites are in the earth shadow, they don't show up.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound