2024-07-01, 10:14 AM
Hello Greg,
I am working on some observing list for galaxy trios and galaxy groups. I found out that some trios are in my Supplemental Database, maybe I put them there years ago and I don´t remember or were imported form some observing list. I had been importing my data from ST2 to 3 and then to 4 so I am not sure where they are coming from.
With galaxy groups that are in the database like Hickson, ST can calculate the difficulty and other conditions, the magnitude is usually the brightest member magnitude and there is the size of the group and the number of members. It's possible to include those in the groups or trios entered in the supplemental database? Can it calculate the visibility just with the magnitude and knowing that is a group of galaxies, by an approximate superficial luminosity estimation?
Any suggestions about how to get sky tools to estimate visibility of galaxy groups that are not in the database as groups, the galaxies are there thought, but other that including the members one by one, which was my approach in the past.
Thanks. Clear skies,
Carles
I am working on some observing list for galaxy trios and galaxy groups. I found out that some trios are in my Supplemental Database, maybe I put them there years ago and I don´t remember or were imported form some observing list. I had been importing my data from ST2 to 3 and then to 4 so I am not sure where they are coming from.
With galaxy groups that are in the database like Hickson, ST can calculate the difficulty and other conditions, the magnitude is usually the brightest member magnitude and there is the size of the group and the number of members. It's possible to include those in the groups or trios entered in the supplemental database? Can it calculate the visibility just with the magnitude and knowing that is a group of galaxies, by an approximate superficial luminosity estimation?
Any suggestions about how to get sky tools to estimate visibility of galaxy groups that are not in the database as groups, the galaxies are there thought, but other that including the members one by one, which was my approach in the past.
Thanks. Clear skies,
Carles