| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Opposition of (4183) Cuno
Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-19, 06:22 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 23
|
New Version 4.x.11.21 Upd...
Forum: Announcements
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-18, 10:52 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 66
|
Close Approach of (152637...
Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-18, 05:49 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 758
|
Annals of the Deep Sky
Forum: Sumbitted Observing/Target Lists
Last Post: Icharuss
2026-06-18, 12:16 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 39
|
Nebulae by Steven R Coe h...
Forum: Sumbitted Observing/Target Lists
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-15, 05:00 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 65
|
Galaxies Lists from Stein...
Forum: Sumbitted Observing/Target Lists
Last Post: theskyhound
2026-06-15, 04:08 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 62
|
Mutual Events of Galilean...
Forum: How do I do it in SkyTools 4 Visual?
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-13, 05:35 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 350
|
Close Approach of 2026 LS...
Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-06-12, 06:41 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 84
|
Best Sort for Observing?
Forum: How do I do it in SkyTools 4 Visual?
Last Post: coupegriz
2026-06-12, 03:10 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 761
|
Close Approach of 2026 KB...
Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
Last Post: PMSchu
2026-05-29, 06:23 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 195
|
|
|
| Database Power Search Multiple Stars |
|
Posted by: dnorton618 - 2023-05-09, 05:27 PM - Forum: How do I do it in SkyTools 4 Visual?
- Replies (4)
|
 |
I have all of my observational logs in SkyTools. Over 2100 entries. What I would like to do is perform a database power search for all double/multiple stars I have observed (logged) so far.
In the database power search tool, under the Stars tab, there are many filtering options. If I select no check marks under "Databases to Search" and leave all other selections as default, except for the "Include Objects With Log Entries" and choose "Logged", I return 679 entries. If I choose "Multiple Stars Only" in the "Databases to Search" and again leave all filters default except the "Logged" option, I return 568 entries. When I do a search with both "Multiple Stars Only" and "Variable Stars Only" checked, again with "Logged" objects, I return 214 entries. If I then do another search and choose "Variable Stars Only" I return 114 entries.
I know that there are many stars designated as variable/double stars, "Component of Multiple Star". So how do I get an accurate count of how many multiple stars I have observed and logged if some multiple stars are also designated as variables?
It seems that if I'm choosing "Multiple Stars Only" I may not be getting returns for all of the stars that are designated as variable/double stars. Does anyone have any idea how to get an accurate search return for all multiple stars I have observed? Does the "Multiple Stars Only" checkbox include variable/double stars?
For example: V376 Cep. Its Object Information reads as a "Variable" and a "Component of Multiple Star".
It is in the "All Stars" search results. (No check marks under “Databases to Search”)
It is in the "Variable stars Only" checked search.
It is not in the "Multiple Stars Only" checked search.
It is not in the "Multiple Stars Only" and "Variable Stars Only" checked search.
Any help or advice would be appreciated. Or if there is another way to filter out and search just for all Double/Multiple Stars I have logged.
If I go to the Log Browser and choose the Class of object, only Stars is available, and it lists 690 objects. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
| Cepheid Variables |
|
Posted by: Christina LeGrand - 2023-05-07, 03:59 PM - Forum: How do I do it in SkyTools 4 Visual?
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hello All,
I am a faithful, devoted, multi-decade user of Sky Tools, and really love it. Is there a way to get a list of bright Cepheid variables in the Milky Way? It might be a fun thing to add to my public outreach observing list to show people and explain about Henrietta Leavitt, Ed Hubble, the accelerating expansion of the universe, etc., and all that good stuff.
Thank you for any ideas!
Christina LeGrand
|
|
|
| Close Approach of 2023 HZ3 |
|
Posted by: PMSchu - 2023-04-24, 05:21 PM - Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
- Replies (1)
|
 |
CNEOS predicts that the newly discovered NEO, 2023 HZ3, will make a close approach on 2023-Apr-28 23:47±00:17 UT at a distance of 0.00318 AU, V Relative=8.79 km/sec, H=27.5 magnitude, size 8.4 m - 19 m, 'Rarity'=0. The Condition Code=7 with a 2 day observation arc. The Earth MOID=0.0025366 AU This NEO was first observed at Pan-STARRS 2, Haleakala on 2023-04-22. The orbit should be refined as more observations are obtained.
Using MPC's elements for 2023 Apr 24 0000 UT, ST4v predicts that the close approach will occur (to the nearest hour) on 2023 Apr 29 0000 EDT when the NEO will be 480.2k km distant at 17.3 magnitude moving through Pavo at 230"/min in daylight and below the horizon in Columbus, Ohio. The peak brightness of 16.7 magnitude is predicted to occur 2023 Apr 28 1100 EDT with the object in Lupus moving at 166"/min again in daylight below the horizon. This is a southern hemisphere object.
Here's an Object Info dialog for this NEO:
The time of the close approach should become more accurate in the next several days. As this object will be very close, parallax will affect the observed positions. Everyone will need finder charts for their location with recent elements.
Good hunting,
Phil S.
|
|
|
| Watching the Big Rock - 2023 GQ2 |
|
Posted by: bigmasterdrago - 2023-04-19, 09:17 PM - Forum: Observing Close Approaching Asteroids
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Now with 29 obs over 7 days, the info on this large PHA is getting locked in but still no old data from past due to the infrequent close passes.
I think the big guys may be able to track it until early June when it crosses the 24th mag zone.
The next near Earth pass is scary close:
2028-Nov-16 05:36 ± 4_11:31 Earth minimum distance 0.0e+0
This rock is no pebble - H = 19.8 <=> 290~650 m
Hard hats required.
|
|
|
| Quasar BTC40 J1429+011, Magnitude: 19.40, z=4.84 (missed it by that much!) |
|
Posted by: Dennis - 2023-04-18, 09:09 AM - Forum: Deep Sky Astrophotography
- Replies (10)
|
 |
I used the “Database Power Search Tool” in SkyTools 4 Imaging to select and download a list of Quasars in Virgo with a Redshift (z) between 4 and 6.
On that list I found BTC40 J1429+011 listed at Magnitude: 19.40 I, so I thought I’d fit my IR Pass IR742 filter and see if I could record this Quasar. An on-line search indicated the following:
SIMBAD Basic data :
[VV2006] J142926.5+011954 -- Quasar
ICRS coord. (ep=J2000): 14 29 26.4254653128 +01 19 53.572666764 (Optical)
B 24.55
V 22.53
G 20.579714
u (AB) 23.63
g (AB) 24.04
r (AB) 21.121
i (AB) 19.731
z (AB) 19.578
Although I could not hope to record objects at mag 23 or 24, I figured I might be in with a chance at i=19.731 using my IR742 Filter.
SkyTools 4 showed this Quasar with a Redshift (z): 4.84 and Light Time: 13.0 Gyr.
IMAGING DATA - I captured 60x60 sec exposures.
- Tak Mewlon 210 F11.5
- Tak x0.8 Reducer
- ZWO ASI294MM Pro Camera
- Bin 2x2 (3126x2088 Pixels)
- IR Pass Filter IR742.
- Suburban Bortle 6/7 skies.
After Calibrating, Aligning and Stacking the frames, using averted vision and knowing the pre-conceived position of BTC40 J1429+011, I could just detect a faint smudge where the Quasar was meant to be, but I wouldn’t have bet the farm on it.
So, I had a fascinating journey into the universe of on-line Professional Resources and using SIMBAD and Aladin Lite, I managed to find a set of reference images which showed that my Quasar was indeed a “ghost”, an imaging artefact that had been amplified through image processing techniques such as mirco-contrast enhancement and deconvolution.
Oh well, for one brief moment I felt like I had nailed it, but it was not to be.
I have included the following images:- Full FOV showing a 1600x1600 crop overlay
- My inverted 1600x1600 crop showing the “ghost” position of the Quasar.
- An enlarged composite showing the offset between the actual position and my "ghost" object.
Astrometry.Net Results for the 1600x1600 inverted crop.- Center (RA, Dec): (217.333, 1.368)
- Center (RA, hms): 14h 29m 20.033s
- Center (Dec, dms): +01° 22' 03.673"
- Size: 11.7 x 11.7 arcmin
- Radius: 0.138 deg
- Pixel scale: 0.439 arcsec/pixel
- Orientation: Up is 359.9 degrees E of N
A composite image from Aladin Lite overlaid on my up-sample image showing the offset between the real Quasar and my candidate. Even though this offset is small, it is significant that all other objects faithfully line up with no offset.
Such is life.
Cheers
Dennis
|
|
|
|